Thursday, May 9, 2013

GUN CONTROL? or is it?


In West Virginia, Jared Marcum, an eighth grader, was suspended and astonishingly arrested in April after he refused to remove a t-shirt supporting the National Rifle Association.

 
Now in what I would say and most people would agree as very courageous, the 14-year old Jared returned back to Logan Middle School in, West Va., wearing exactly the same shirt, which depicts a hunting rifle with the statement “Protect your right.”

 According to Fox News, other students across the rural county showed their support for Marcum by wearing similar shirts to school as well. “There’s a lot of people wearing this same exact shirt, great support and I really appreciate it,” Marcum said that morning outside the schoolhouse door, according to a local NCB affiliate WBOY-TV.

 Marcum’s attorney, Ben White, said that school officials are sticking by the eighth grader’s one-day suspension because, they say, he caused a disruption. “Their version is that the suspension was for disrupting the educational process, not the shirt,” White told Fox News. I'm pretty sure time and effort could have been used in a better manner to prevent a further disruption with the incident than a so-called suspension of "the problem". Maybe that's why I'm not getting paid to serve as an school official, huh? LOL.

 White has as well called the school’s position into question. He argues that his client was exercising his free speech rights. Marcum’s version of events is that he had worn the shirt for several hours already without incident. So at lunchtime, a teacher confronted him about the shirt. When Marcum said that he would not take off the shirt or turn it inside out, the teacher began yelling, which caused an unnecessary scene in the cafeteria.
 

 

As what I would think most of my readers would agree, this is the catalyst that ensued the event from the start. I mean, a pile of wood isn’t a fire until you strike a match to it, right? I believe the teacher was acting beyond the perspective of his employment and was promoting his/her personal agenda. As the school did contain cameras, the video shows students stepping up on benches and the tables in the lunchroom as kids started jumped up and clapping, when they eventually escorted Jared out of building.

The police chief in Logan City, E.K. Harper, said that Marcum was arrested for the disruption he caused at school: “His conduct in school almost incited a riot.” Not too sure about you guys, but when was the last first time you heard of some eight graders inciting a riot? White, the lawyer, added that Marcum wore the shirt to express his support for the Second Amendment. So in light of not officially breaking any school regulations or inciting any disturbance, who would be observed as the wrongdoer?  White also said the school’s dress code does not forbid such shirts. A straightforward reading of the dress code would seem to leave that interpretation out. Although, the dress code, which is posted online, does forbid certain kinds of clothing. For example, the dress code prohibits messages that support violence, discrimination and alcohol use, but nowhere are displaying constitutional rights mentioned.

So as Marcum and his supporters returned back to school the following Monday, they were not arrested or suspended for wearing the pro-gun shirts. I wonder how is that more individuals doing the same thing are somehow any less of a threat than one student. White still expects the charges to be dropped, and he says a civil lawsuit is forthcoming.

Marcum’s arrest and suspension is the latest incident of anti-gun hysteria to erupt in a school setting, but there have been many others in the last few months.